From Sportfishing
Fish Report for 1-8-2009
CDFG Press Release: California Outdoors Q&As
1-8-2009
Marine Management News
Contact: Carrie Wilson, Office of Communications, CalOutdoors@dfg.ca.gov .
Question: I am in a duck club and we get geese in the field between
our blinds. It is impossible to sneak up on the geese without being
seen. We made a life-size cow silhouette and painted it black and white
just like the cows in the field. We are planning on hiding behind it to
sneak up within shooting range of the geese. Is this a legal decoy to
use? (Scott L.)
Answer: No, it is not legal to use any mammal (except a dog) or an
imitation of a mammal as a blind in approaching or taking game birds
(FGC Section 3502.) According to Capt. (ret.) Phil Nelms, hunters have
long known the benefits of using cattle as duck blinds. In fact, in the
early days market hunters were known to train large steers to act as
live decoys for them to hide behind while they "walked their shot"
to approach the unsuspecting birds for a closer and better shot.
One of the most famous live decoys was a hunting steer by the name of
"Old Tom." When his owner bought him in 1914, Old Tom weighed
1,850 pounds and stood 5 ft. 8 in. high. During the days of market
hunting, he was utilized in practically every inland county in the state
and made an excellent blind because of his training, size and build.
Because of the high success of this method, market hunters were banned
from this practice nearly a century ago, and sportsmen have been banned
from this practice since 1957.
For more, see the article of "Old Tom" titled "The famous animal
blind." California Fish and Game. 1928. Vol. 14:62 available online at
www.archive.org/details/californiafishga14_1928cali
(See photo at www.dfg.ca.gov/QandA/2009/20090108.asp)
Question: I don't get to go fishing that often, so I am wondering if I
am fortunate enough to get a limit of fish in the morning and I put
those fish on ice in the truck, can I then go back out in the afternoon
to catch more? I often travel around 100 miles to go fishing, and with
the economy as bad as it is, I can't go often. Is this legal? Thanks.
(Ron F.)
Answer: I can understand you wanting to maximize your fishing
experience and harvest due to the troubled economy; however, a "bag
limit" means the total that you can take in one day. And "possession
limit" is usually the same as your bag limit (at least in ocean
waters), so you are only allowed to possess one bag limit at any one
time. In order to collect more, you will need to either consume or give
away what you have and then fish on another day for more, up to the bag
limit allowed.
Question: Why do fishing and hunting license fees and various cards
and tags increase in price every year? This concerns my friends and me
as we are of the older population of California and are on fixed
incomes. Hunting and fishing are some of the only pleasures we have to
enjoy in our old age, but it is becoming so costly we won't be able to
afford it if you keep raising prices. (Bill D.)
Answer: California law establishes fishing and hunting license fees
each year, not the Department of Fish and Game (DFG). The base fee for
sport fishing licenses is established in Fish and Game Code Section 7149
and the fees for stamps and most report cards are established in other
sections of the Fish and Game Code or CCR, Title 14 Regulations.
According to License Program Analyst Glenn Underwood, the Fish and Game
code requires license fees to be adjusted in response to increases (or
decreases) in costs of goods and services using an index called the
"Implicit Price Deflator" (Fish and Game Code Section 713). This
index is a gauge of the change in the cost of goods and services from
year to year.
For example, as hatchery, law enforcement and wildlife management costs
have increased, license fees needed to increase to keep pace with these
rising costs. Essentially, license fees are adjusted to compensate for
inflation. If license fees were not adjusted for inflation, then funding
for fish and wildlife management and protection would actually decrease
because the "buying power" of a dollar has declined over the years.
License fee increases over the past five years have ranged from between
1.5% in 2005 to 6.5% in 2007. The average over the past five years has
been 4.7%.
Generally, the cost of goods and services increases at a fairly steady,
slow rate. About two to three percent per year is common. In recent
years, some costs have increased dramatically, particularly the cost of
fuel. Because of this, the cost of goods and services jumped
approximately 6.19% and 2009 license fees increased accordingly. If the
cost of goods and services were to decrease, then license fees would
actually decrease the same percentage. However, when is the last time
the cost of living actually decreased?
Although fishing and hunting license fees have increased throughout the
years, the increase ensures that the DFG has adequate funding to manage
California's diverse fish and wildlife resources and provide the
public with enjoyable fishing and hunting experiences.
Carrie Wilson is a marine biologist with the California Department of
Fish and Game. Her DFG-related question and answer column appears weekly
at www.dfg.ca.gov/QandA. While she cannot personally answer everyone's
questions, she will select a few to answer each week. Please contact her
at CalOutdoors@dfg.ca.gov .
< Previous Report Next Report >
More Reports
1-6-2009
Hello, and welcome to another issue of the Marine Management News, the DFG Marine Region newsletter for everyone interested in...... Read More
1-6-2009
California Marine Life Protection Act Initiative Announcement Who: General public What: MLPA Initiative Mixer, Sea Rocket Bistro in San Diego When: Monday,...... Read More
Website Hosting and Design provided by TECK.net